6 Tips on Giving a Good Critique

My writers group meets this Friday, so I’ve spent most of my writing time this week doing critiques. This has me reflecting on what makes a good critique. Below are some of the things I’ve come up with both from being a critiquer and a critique-ee*, with the disclaimer that I don’t always achieve these ideals when I give a critique.

  1. Remember that you’re there to help. As one of the first readers of a manuscript, your role  is invaluable. Everything matters — if something made you laugh, let the author know. If something confused the heck out of you, let her know that, too. As nice as it is to hear, “This is perfect, don’t change a thing!”, that’s only helpful if the manuscript really is perfect (and I’ve never read a perfect piece of writing, including published stuff).
  2. Be specific. Comments like, “Funny,” or “Sad” jotted beside certain parts of the work are specific enough if the writer can see what you refer to, and they’re helpful in letting him know whether his writing is having the desired effect. But when pointing out something that’s not working, being specific can save a writer a lot of frustration. “I don’t like this,” scribbled beside a paragraph isn’t nearly as helpful as, “I get a little lost in this section because there’s so much information crammed into each sentence.”
  3. Establish a hierarchy of concerns. Most writers won’t get every comma or capitalization right on their first draft, but don’t get too fixated on this if it’s the pacing of the action or the character development in the story that needs work. Remember that a lot of a writers’ first drafts will be rewritten, and some of those commas you’ve painstakingly inserted will be deleted and become irrelevant.  Think big picture first, then zero in on “little picture” stuff if the big picture’s lookin’ good. (Of course, you can always be like me, who tries to think big picture but compulsively inserts commas into sentences that will probably be deleted, anyway. It’s like a sickness. I can’t help it.)
  4. Use humor. My favorite part of my group’s monthly meetings is the laughter. Humor doesn’t have to poke fun at someone’s writing or be derogatory; all it takes is one critiquer’s misinterpretation of a sentence to have us wiping our eyes with laughter. Humor helps us see all the strange possibilities that exist in every arrangement of words, and  it helps us redirect our sentences toward a clarity that hopefully won’t leave our future readers scratching their heads or smirking at inappropriate times.
  5. Remember to point out what you like. Sometimes, as critiquers we get so focused on being “critical” that we forget that our job is to point out what works, too. I’m guilty of letting pages of beautifully writing go by without comment because I’m too enraptured to pick up my pen. But without making a comment about that, the writer doesn’t know whether his pages were perfect or whether I just stopped paying attention.
  6. Be kind. No matter how early the draft you’re looking at, a critique should never be needlessly harsh. I’ve learned a lot from my fellow critiquers on this one, as I used to be a pretty harsh critiquer. But remember that a writer is trusting you with something from her mind and her heart, and that producing what you hold before you was hard, gut-wrenching work. Ultimately, your writers group needs to be built on trust, and you create that trust by handling one another’s work with care and respect.

A few that didn’t make the list: read the material you’re critiquing more than once (I never have time to do this, but it’s SO helpful if you do), don’t try to edit everyone’s writing to sound like yours (let your writing be yours, and theirs be theirs), write an “overall impressions” paragraph at the end of a critique, and, of course use fun-colored pens!

* This sounds like a new species of cricket.


8 Responses to 6 Tips on Giving a Good Critique

  1. Keir says:

    Normally you use feminine pronouns for gender neutral situations. This time you used both feminine and masculine. I don’t know if this means anything, but I find it interesting.

    • There are both genders in my writers group, some of whom read this blog, and I didn’t want anyone to feel I was leaving them out. When I worked for New Moon, we used the feminine pronoun as the default because our audience, subjects, etc., were primarily female, and to restore some balance since the masculine pronoun is usually used as the default. I’ve carried the feminine default over in a lot of my writing, because I’m used to it, because it applies to me, and because most of the people I interact with are female. A lot of times, I have specific people in mind when I write even if the subject matter is general. For example, when I write about cats I use “she” because both my cats are female, but I noticed that DemandStudios always edited my pieces to alternate between both pronouns. I’ve noticed other places that do this online, too, and think it’s a good way to go. So when using both pronouns won’t confuse people too much, I’ve started trying to do that.

  2. Keir says:

    I know it is thoroughly incorrect, but I usually just use the gender neutral plural pronouns. One of my English professors bawled me out for doing that, but I don’t think it is any worse than assigning a gender to a neutral situation. Alternating genders is an interesting solution, but seems potentially dangerous in some situations. This post made me think that maybe you were specifically thinking of certain people when you assigned a gender. It seems like alternating genders also might imply that each gender specific section you write is more applicable to the chosen gender. Depending on what you are writing, there could be a lot of potential for offensive misinterpretations that way. It’s probably pretty safe for cats though.

  3. Linda says:

    First of all, as a member of your group & a frequent target of your wrath (just kidding), I don’t think you’ve ever been unduly harsh in your critiques.

    One more thing I find helpful about the way our group does critiques is that the writer is able to respond & comment while the critique is in progress. I know there are groups in which the writer has to remain silent until the critique is done. This doesn’t seem as constructive to me. In our group, questions are asked & answered NOW, instead of having to pick up that thread again at the end of the critique. Since our group tends do this in a non-confrontational style, I find it a lot more helpful.

    • I’ve been in critiquing circles where writers are required to hold their comments until the critique is done. I understand the rationale behind this if you’re dealing with writers who are overly defensive about their work and want to “argue” with the critiquer on every point, but I think our group is comprised of writers who are mature enough to thoughtfully consider the good with the bad and make their own decision in the end. I agree that being able to ask and respond to direct questions during the critique is a nice feature of our group.

  4. Jenna says:

    This post makes me wish I was in a writing group, so I could put these tips to good use! 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: